| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mazca Lopez
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
   |
Posted - 2009.08.03 11:15:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Davlos
Originally by: Tomahawk Bliss
Originally by: Davlos
you left out the bit of desiring to leave your seed behind in the wrong gender and orifices.
homophobia is so planet bound. laws on sexuality are the crutch of the mud dwelling grubs that cower beneath the feet of the immortal pod captains.
join the rest of us and evolve Davlos.
I could always conjure the spirit of Utilitarianism and elucidate it in rather gradual terms on how more population = more productivity = more possibilities of this so-called 'evolution' you speak of.
In order to evolve, the seed has to be utilised effectively for a womb to engender further offspring. And in fact, the one who sires, or bears the most offspring could be argued to possess the healthier, better bodies and ergo be more "evolved". Remaining at the end of your line, regardless of your "immortality" that heavily depends on a highly-effective supply chain of hardware, logistics and skilled labor can hardly be argued to be productive in an evolutionary sense, even if the individual in question has the capabilities and mental faculties of a god.
OH Please Mr. Davlos
You seem to have missed the point of evolution completely! Any planetbound sac of trash with wide hips can shoot out an entire colony of inbread tumblings if she has enough sex with her uncle... Im sure Mr. Bliss could be a billionaire, should he desire to sell his little soldiers to women who desires a fine specimin to reproduce from...
|
Mazca Lopez
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2009.08.03 12:18:00 -
[2]
OH Please Mr. Davlos
You seem to have missed the point of evolution completely! Any planetbound sac of trash with wide hips can shoot out an entire colony of inbread tumblings if she has enough sex with her uncle... Im sure Mr. Bliss could be a billionaire, should he desire to sell his little soldiers to women who desires a fine specimin to reproduce from...
I didn't know that you could have tumblings... in bread! Fractionism certainly must've been lowering their standards in recruitment lately. Where in the bleeding cosmos is Cosmo? I'd love to physically punt his smidgen self into the net of one of those fashionable, planetside ball games.
But I digress. The inbred colony will still serve to be far more productive as an ever-regenerating (if restrained) pool of genes that will still provide labor and provide economic benefit for the greater society at large, than a gallivanting self-proclaimed demigod with no intent to continue his/her/its line.
Dont pretend to be any more stupid than you really are sir. Even if i am not as fluint in the more common languages of the galaxy as some, im sure my point was more clear than what you give it credit for...
wake up and smell the quafe, your idears of reproduction and sustainibility seems to be as ancient and bordering ******ed as the concept of a god.
|
Mazca Lopez
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2009.08.03 13:43:00 -
[3]
In order to evolve, the seed has to be utilised effectively for a womb to engender further offspring. And in fact, the one who sires, or bears the most offspring could be argued to possess the healthier, better bodies and ergo be more "evolved".
NO, You were the one who has first, come up with the curious notion above, leading to me pointing our that mere reproduction can just as well lead to devolution as it seems to have been the case in your family!
|
Mazca Lopez
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2009.08.03 14:21:00 -
[4]
"You first!" "Me first!" "I like to have shafts up my bottom!"
Are we going to be playing this game now? You've yet to explain to me in clear terms on why you may think that mere reproduction may lead to the deadening of the gene pool.
You put forth the argument that those reproducing the greatest quantity of offspring
were more "evolved" I pointed back and laughed. Evolution is adaptability, not random mutation, it happens for a reason. In reproduction there is a greater chance for defect and/or defective mutation than the opposite.
|
Mazca Lopez
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2009.08.03 15:17:00 -
[5]
And yet simple disease-causing bacteria carrying no more than thirty genes are able to grow more lethal on an exponential level by random mutation when it spreads itself massively amongst a giant variety of hosts. Oh, sure, they adapt in time. But there is progress. A random process only implies that every possibly outcome has some assigned probability, and that probability is the only thing that influences whether or not a particular event occurs. also "random mutation" not adapted to the environment is unsustainable.
But let us return to the very beginning of this little tirade.
1) Spewing seed into the inappropriate orifices and genders is unproductive, and also, a roadblock and unconducive to evolution.
2) Who are we to judge that an inbred colony spawned by the hypothetical broad and her uncle will most definitely be incapable of adaptation? Is it not your Fractionist creed to liberate such masses and attempt to elevate them to some other state of being? Or have you signed on because being a 'Freecaptain' is really cool and went along for Emotivist reasons?
They'll become extinct in theire own degeneration if they do not berake theire bonds of obsolete thinking.
|
Mazca Lopez
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2009.08.04 14:44:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Mazca Lopez on 04/08/2009 14:46:26
And how am I supposed to be convinced by your laughably delivered threadbare argument, when you're supposed to be the 'more evolved' individual? You've yet to elaborate in full, coherent terms.
This coming from a 'Freecaptain', I'm disappointed.
I speak and answer on my own behalf. That is my privilege. I dont think i can help your understanding along further. Please keep your perception that firtility it a measure of evolutionary progress. That is after all your right.
|
Mazca Lopez
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2009.08.04 14:46:00 -
[7]
Edited by: Mazca Lopez on 04/08/2009 14:46:03
|
| |
|